Are you in Canada? Click here to proceed to the HK Canada website.

For all other locations, click here to continue to the HK US website.

Human Kinetics Logo

Purchase Courses or Access Digital Products

If you are looking to purchase online videos, online courses or to access previously purchased digital products please press continue.

Mare Nostrum Logo

Purchase Print Products or eBooks

Human Kinetics print books and eBooks are now distributed by Mare Nostrum, throughout the UK, Europe, Africa and Middle East, delivered to you from their warehouse. Please visit our new UK website to purchase Human Kinetics printed or eBooks.

Feedback Icon Feedback Get $15 Off

FREE SHIPPING!

Free shipping for orders over $100

Why are Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) important?

This is an excerpt from Examination of Musculoskeletal Injuries 5th Edition With HKPropel Access by Sandra J. Shultz & Tamara C. Valovich McLeod.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

While the subjective history allows you to collect information about symptoms, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) allow you to collect additional information about the patient’s health status. This information supplements the physical examination components and aids in treatment planning and determining the intervention effectiveness. PROMs are administered as self-report surveys or questionnaires and are used to obtain the patient’s perspective regarding their symptoms, impairments, functional status, and health-related quality of life. Health-related quality of life considers the “physical, psychological, and social domains of health, seen as distinct areas that are influenced by a person’s experiences, beliefs, expectations, and perceptions.”1 Many PROMs aim to evaluate health-related quality of life through general domains, such as physical functioning, psychological functioning, cognitive functioning, social well-being, and disability.

Including PROMs in the examination process allows clinicians to obtain information directly from the patient more objectively compared to the typical history portion of an assessment, which allows patient-specific concerns to be included into the care plan and tracked over the course of recovery. Patient-oriented outcomes complement clinician-based outcomes in ensuring evaluations include all domains of contemporary disablement models. Disablement models are frameworks for clinical practice, research, and health care policy that consider that the patient’s experience is the result of several interrelated factors. Most health care disciplines have adopted the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) model (figure 10.2).

Health Condition - Supraspinatus tendon tear
Figure 10.2 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Model.
Reprinted by permission from A.R. Snyder, J.T. Parsons, T.C. Valovich McLeod, et al. “Using Disablement Models and Clinical Outcomes Assessment to Enable Evidence-Based Athletic Training Practice, Part I: Disablement Models. Journal of Athletic Training 43, no. 4 (2008): 428-36.


This model includes the domains of body function and structures, activity, and participation, with environmental factors and personal factors adding contextual constructs to the domains. Body function and structures refers to the physiological and psychological function as well as the specific structures involved in a particular condition. Activities describe everyday tasks, such as walking or jumping, that may be affected by impairments in body function and structures and how the condition affects the patient as an individual. Participation refers to additional life situational contexts being added to activities, such as running with a cross-country team or watching a film with a football team. These situational contexts provide additional information about how the condition affects the patient within their societal identities.

Patient-oriented outcomes are obtained from surveys and questionnaires that assess concerns important to the patient, including symptoms, functional ability, or health-related quality of life.  Clinician-based outcomes are obtained from tests and measures the clinician performs, including range of motion, strength, or soft tissue tests.

The ICF model also considers environmental and personal factors that can influence health status. Environmental factors are often extrinsic and may include the physical and social environment as well as social support and relationships, available services, and health care policies. Personal factors are more intrinsic, such as age, prior medical history, life experiences, and education, among others. Both environmental and personal factors can include other social determinants of health: the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. This includes employment, social environment, public safety, housing, education, race, health services, transportation, environment, income, and wealth.2 Using generic and specific PROMs can assist clinicians in assessing all disablement model domains to provide whole-person health care.

Generic vs Specific vs Single-item PROMs
Many PROMs are available, and each clinician needs to assess patient-specific factors (e.g., type of injury, illness, or condition, patient’s age, patient’s activity level) and administrative factors (e.g., time available to administer, electronic versus paper) before choosing which to administer. Furthermore, clinicians should understand the criteria for selecting PROMs (table 10.1) and whether a PROM is appropriate for a specific patient. At the most basic level, PROMs are categorized into three categories: generic, specific, and single item.3

Generic, or general, PROMs are global assessments that may evaluate a broad range of domains often associated with health-related quality of life. These PROMs typically contain subscales that focus on physical, psychological, social, or emotional constructs for how the condition impacts overall health status. Since generic PROMs capture these global domains, they can be used to assess patients across a wide range of illnesses and injuries. However, it may be more difficult to assess changes in scores throughout treatment due to the lack of specificity in the included items. Some patients may find the questions irrelevant to their specific situation, especially if they are a high-functioning athlete and the PROM was intended for a general patient population.

Table 10.1 Criteria for Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Reprinted by permission from A.R. Snyder, J.T. Parsons, T.C. Valovich McLeod et al. Using Disablement Models and Clinical Outcomes Assessment to enable Evidence-Based Athletic Training Practice, Part I: Disablement Models. Journal of Athletic Training 43, no. 4 (2008): 428-36.



More Excerpts From Examination of Musculoskeletal Injuries 5th Edition With HKPropel Access