Are you in Canada? Click here to proceed to the HK Canada website.

For all other locations, click here to continue to the HK US website.

Human Kinetics Logo

Purchase Courses or Access Digital Products

If you are looking to purchase online videos, online courses or to access previously purchased digital products please press continue.

Mare Nostrum Logo

Purchase Print Products or eBooks

Human Kinetics print books and eBooks are now distributed by Mare Nostrum, throughout the UK, Europe, Africa and Middle East, delivered to you from their warehouse. Please visit our new UK website to purchase Human Kinetics printed or eBooks.

Feedback Icon Feedback Get $15 Off


Free shipping for orders over $99

Need to access your Online Course or Ebook?

Using constant error and variable error

This is an excerpt from Motor Control and Learning 6th Edition With Web Resource by Richard Schmidt,Tim Lee,Carolee Winstein,Gabriele Wulf & Howard Zelaznik.

An additional aspect of error scores is important from the point of view not only of research but also of practical application. Compare two riflemen: Rifleman A has a large VE and small CE, whereas rifleman B has a small VE and large CE. This situation was described years ago by Chapanis (1951) and is illustrated in figure 2.4 (see "The Relative Importance of Constant and Variable Errors"). Which riflemanman, A or B, appears to be the more skilled?

The study of motor learning will show that the measure of error that is most sensitive to the effects of practice is consistency (VE); bias (CE) often changes quickly in the first several trials and remains near zero thereafter, even after years of practice. There are some situations, however, in which CE is preferred to VE; but these are specialized applications. Thus, these two measures of error, CE and VE, seem to represent two distinct aspects of performance - bias and variability, respectively. But sometimes it is more desirable to have a single measure of "overall error" that combines both of these performance indicators rather than using separate measures of accuracy and inconsistency.

The Relative Importance of Constant and Variable Errors

Research Capsule

Alphonse Chapanis was one of the pioneers in the emergence of human factors research. His analysis of errors in movement is as important today as it was over a half century ago.

"Having defined constant and variable errors, we might ask: Which is the more important? Let us return for a moment to the target patterns shot by the two riflemen [figure 2.4]. At first glance, you might say that B is a very inaccurate shooter. And yet any rifleman will tell you that this is not the case at all. B is a much better shooter than A. The reason is this: The large constant error in the trial shots fired by B can be compensated for very easily by simple adjustments in his sights. With suitable corrections in elevation and windage, rifleman B will turn in a perfect score. In rifle shooting, then, constant errors are not the important ones, because they can be very easily adjusted for by changing the position of the sights on the gun. The really important errors are the variable errors. No correction of the sights on A's gun will make all of his shots fall in the center. He is inherently much too variable." (Chapanis, 1951, p. 1187)

Figure 2.4 Distribution of rifle shots. Rifleman A has a small constant error (CE) and large variable error (VE). Rifleman B has a large CE bias, but a small VE.
Figure 2.4 Distribution of rifle shots. Rifleman A has a small constant error (CE) and large variable error (VE). Rifleman B has a large CE bias, but a small VE.

Reprinted, by permission, from A. Chapanis, 1951, "Theory and methods for analyzing errors in man-machine systems," Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 51: 1181.

Learn more about Motor Control and Learning, Sixth Edition With Web Resource.

More Excerpts From Motor Control and Learning 6th Edition With Web Resource